← All Markets
Overview
Strategy A
Strategy B
Trade Viewer
Regime Analysis
Entry Filters
Trading Costs
Monte Carlo
Variant Model →
Trading Costs: Gross vs. Net
Every result shown elsewhere on this site is GROSS — zero fees, zero funding. This page applies a real Bybit USDT-perpetual cost model to every trade: 0.055% taker fee on both entry and exit (this strategy's entries/exits are structure breaks and stop-hits — effectively market orders, not resting limit orders that could earn the lower maker rate), plus Bybit's actual historical BTCUSDT funding rate at every 8-hour funding timestamp the trade was open for, applied to the BTC price at that moment — a long pays when the rate is positive and receives when negative, the standard perpetual-funding convention. Both figures are computed per-trade (unlike a fixed spread, a perpetual's cost scales with price and with how long the position was held) then converted to an R-multiple deduction using each trade's own risk (|entry − stop|), same as every other market on this site. Basis: Bybit USDT-perpetual — taker fee (0.055%/side) + actual historical funding rate over each trade's holding period.
Strategy A
Avg cost per trade: 0.169R. edge does NOT survive costs
Avg R/Trade
+0.10 → -0.07
Total R
+166.9 → -118.7
Profit Factor
1.183 → 0.895
Win Rate
29.65% → 26.99%
Final Balance ($1,000 start)
$3,201 → $184


Strategy B
Avg cost per trade: 0.176R. edge does NOT survive costs
Avg R/Trade
+0.13 → -0.05
Total R
+143.5 → -55.1
Profit Factor
1.175 → 0.944
Win Rate
21.26% → 19.84%
Final Balance ($1,000 start)
$2,523 → $347


Read: at least one strategy does NOT survive this cost estimate — its apparent edge is an artifact of ignoring execution costs. Strategy A's total return is reduced by 171.1% after costs, Strategy B's by 138.4%. Whichever strategy has the thinner gross avg R/trade (here, Strategy A) has the least margin to absorb execution costs before its edge becomes marginal — if funding rates or realized slippage on fills run meaningfully worse than the historical average used here, that strategy is the one to re-examine first.